5 Mar 2009

Bank of England now controlled by Major Douglas

proposal is very simple - and heretical. It is that the government - or rather the Bank of England - creates the money

Hugo Chavez looked carefully into printing cash and decided it was too radical, Professor Mervyn King and his amigos in the Monetary Policy Committe have today decided that such a policy must be pursued to prevent the recession morphing into a depression.

I have studied this idea in some detail, mainly from an interest in the far right associations of those who developed it.

In the 1920s and 30s Major Douglas, amongst other often quite fascinating economic ideas, argued that money was a social construct and that rather than banks creating it in the form of debt, the 'community' could make money and solve economics problems.

Unfortunately (and this is not the case with Mervyn King and friends) Douglas was a raving anti-semite obssessed with banking conspiracies, 'Jewish' plots. He quoted the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and his ideas directly flowed into the policies of Oswald Mosley, the National Front and others on the loony anti-semitic far right.

Modern followers of social credit have often been unprepared to criticise his racist excess and I have had a lot of stick for point them out.

Douglas's racism is not the issue today. The Bank of England is to magic £75 billion out of nothing. Its easy. They print the cash and use it to buy back bonds they sold earlier to banks to borrow money.

There are some technical issues. If you print money this can create inflation...however a bit of inflation would be welcome to the economy, even if our currency crashes our dwindling British exports will revive.

Money is neutral...i.e. it is not key to reviving the economy, print more money and the real issue is confidence, as Keynes (who praised Douglas but largely ignored Marx) argued, if confidence is low the money may not be spent.

However the present economic crisis is linked to banking failure so credit droughts are making life tough for business, in these circumstances money is more active!

Is it utopia? No, we need to move to an ecological economy and this involves rather more fundamental and complex changes, as a socialist I would also argue that people are not simply exploited by banks, they are exploited by a whole capitalist system of which finance is an essential part but a part not the whole.

Of course...money cannot just be printed in most circumstances...people would lose faith in the currency and it would crash beyond what is beneficial!

So yes printing money is possible at present, it would be good to use some of it to fund renewable energy and creating eco homes for all, etc...but its part of the solution at best.


Stuart Jeffery said...

So you are suggesting that it is better to leave money creation to private banks rather than the government just because one of the historical proponent was not nice.

Wouldn't it be better to get over the historic Douglas connection and look at the excellent work of FEASTA, Robertson etc.? Look at the theory rather than the one person who liked something similar?

Derek Wall said...

thanks for your swift comment, I think I have covered some of the technical issues here and yes I would like to see the end of banking outside of mutual institutions....

feel free to post some links if you think this would help the debate,,

Imperialism Is the Arsonist: Marxism’s Contribution to Ecological Literatures and Struggles

Derek Wall ’s article entitled  Imperialism Is the Arsonist: Marxism’s Contribution to Ecological Literatures and Struggles , argues that Ma...