Another Green World

Derek Wall is the Principal Male Speaker of the Green Party of England and Wales. "How to be green? Many people have asked us this important question. It's really very simple and requires no expert knowledge or complex skills. Here's the answer. Consume less. Share more. Enjoy life." Penny Kemp and Derek Wall This blog promotes anti-capitalism, green politics, direct action, practical lifestyle change, Venezuela/Cuba and a touch of Zen. Ecosocialism or muerte!

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

May 13, 1985 Massacre in the city of brotherly love


had this from Mumia....

On today, May 13, 1985, 11 MOVE men, women and children were bombed, burned and shot to death in the city of Philadelphia. No police officer or city, state or federal official did one second of one moment of jail time for these horrific murders. The sole adult survivor, Ramona Africa, did seven years in prison simply for surviving that wicked day

Alice summed it up...and guess what Mumia Abu-Jamal a supporter of the MOVE organisation is still in jail today but still militant and poetic in his work!


Nobody was Supposed to Survive
by Alice Walker
from Living by the Word, London: Women's Press (1988), 155-7, 159-60.

[More on MOVE]



'Nobody was supposed to survive.' - Ramona Africa (New York Times, 7 January 1986)



Police Drop Bomb on Radicals' Home in Philadelphia - New York Times 14may85
After the Inferno. Tears and Bewilderment - New York Times 15may85
Nobody was Supposed to Survive - Alice Walker from Living by the Word 1988
Philadelphia, city officials ordered to Pay $1.5 Million to MOVE Survivor - CNN 24jun96
6 Bodies in Ashes of Radicals' Home; Assault Defended - New York Times 15may85

I was in Paris in mid-May of 1985 when I heard the news about MOVE. My traveling companion read aloud the item in the newspaper that described the assault on a house on Osage Avenue in Philadelphia occupied by a group of 'radical, black, back-to-nature' revolutionaries that local authorities had been 'battling' for over a decade. As he read the article detailing the attack that led, eventually, to the actual bombing of the house (with military bombing material supplied to local police by the FBI) and the deaths of at least eleven people, many of them women, five of them children, our mutual feeling was of horror, followed immediately by anger and grief. Grief: that feeling of unassuageable sadness and rage that makes the heart feel naked to the elements, clawed by talons of ice. For, even knowing nothing of MOVE (short for Movement, which a revolution assumes) and little of the 'City of Brotherly Love', Philadelphia, we recognized the heartlessness of the crime, and realized that for the local authorities to go after eleven people, five of them children, with the kind of viciousness and force usually reserved for war, what they were trying to kill had to be more than the human beings involved; it had to be a spirit, an idea. But what spirit? What idea?

There was only one adult survivor of the massacre: a young black woman named Ramona Africa. She suffered serious burns over much of her body (and would claim, later in court, as she sustained her own defense: 'I am guilty of nothing but hiding in the basement trying to protect myself and ... MOVE children'). The bombing of the MOVE house ignited a fire that roared through the black, middle-class neighborhood, totally destroying more than sixty houses and leaving 250 people homeless.

There we stood on a street corner in Paris, reading between the lines. It seems MOVE people never combed their hair, but wore it in long 'ropes' that people assumed were unclean. Since this is also how we wear out hair, we recognized this 'weird' style: dreadlocks. The style of the ancients: Ethiopians and Egyptians. Easily washed, quickly dried - a true wash-and-wear style for black people (and adventuresome whites) and painless, which is no doubt why MOVE people chose it for their children. And "for themselves: 'Why suffer for cosmetic reasons?' they must have asked.

It appeared that the MOVE people were vegetarians and ate their food raw because they believed raw food healthier for the body and the soul. They believed in letting orange peels, banana peels, and other organic refuse 'cycle' back into the earth. Composting? They did not believe in embalming dead people or burying them in caskets. They thought they should be allowed to 'cycle' back to the earth, too. They loved dogs (their leader, John Africa, was called 'The Dog Man' because he cared for so many) and never killed animals of any kind, not even rats (which infuriated their neighbors), because they believed in the sanctity of all life.

Hmmm.

Further: They refused to send their children to school, fearing drugs and an indoctrination into the sickness of American life. They taught them to enjoy 'natural' games, in the belief that games based on such figures as Darth Vader caused 'distortions' in the personalities of the young that inhibited healthy, spontaneous expression. They exercised religiously, running miles every day with their dogs, rarely had sit-down dinners, ate out of big sacks of food whenever they were hungry, owned no furniture except a few pieces they'd found on the street, and refused to let their children wear diapers because of the belief that a free bottom is healthier. They abhorred the use of plastic. They enjoyed, apparently, the use of verbal profanity, which they claimed lost any degree of profanity when placed next to atomic or nuclear weapons of any sort, which they considered really profane. They hated the police, who they claimed harassed them relentlessly (a shoot-out with police in 1978 resulted in the death of one officer and the imprisonment of several MOVE people). They occasionally self-righteously and disruptively harangued their neighbors, using bullhorns. They taught anyone who would listen that the US political and social system is corrupt to the core - and tried to be, themselves, a different tribe within it....

... the city officials and MOVE neighbors appeared to have one thing in common: a hatred of the way MOVE people chose to live. They didn't like the 'stench' of people who refused, because they believe chemicals cause cancer, to use deodorant; didn't like orange peels and watermelon rinds on the ground; didn't like all those 'naked' children running around with all that uncombed hair. They didn't appreciate the dogs and the rats. They thought the children should be in school and that the adults and children should eat cooked food; everybody should eat meat. They probably thought it low class that in order to make money MOVE people washed cars and shoveled snow. And appeared to enjoy it.

MOVE people were not middle class. Many of them were high-school dropouts. Many of them were mothers without husbands. Or young men who refused any inducement to 'fit in'. Yet they had the nerve to critique the system. To reject it and to set up, in place of its rules, guidelines for living that reflected their own beliefs.

The people of MOVE are proof that poor people, not just upper- and middle-class whites and blacks who become hippies, are capable of intelligently perceiving and analyzing American life, politically and socially, and of devising and attempting to follow a different - and, to them, better - way. But because they are poor and black, this is not acceptable behavior to middle-class whites and blacks who think all poor black people should be happy with jherri curls, mindless (and lying) TV shows, and Kentucky fried chicken.

This is not to condone the yelping of fifty to sixty dogs in the middle of the night, dogs MOVE people rescued from the streets (and probable subsequent torture in 'scientific' laboratories), fed, and permitted to sleep in their house. Nor to condone the bullhorn they used to air their neighbors' 'backwardness' or political transgressions, as apparently they had a bad habit of doing. From what I read, MOVE people were more fanatical than the average neighbors. I probably would not have been able to live next door to them for a day.

The question is: Did they deserve the harassment, abuse, and, finally, the vicious death other people's intolerance of their life style brought upon them?

Every bomb ever made falls on all of us.

And the answer is: No.

Colleagues

the message below comes from pro-choice activists in Northern Ireland.

On Tuesday 20 May (NEXT TUESDAY) Members of Parliament will debate and vote on the anti-abortion amendments to the Human Embryology and Fertilisation Bill. The key amendments aim to lower the time limit for abortion and must be defeated. One of the amendments will also call for the Abortion Act to be finally extended to Northern Ireland. I probably don't need to tell you that if and when this kind of decision-making is given back to the DUP and Sinn Fein in Stormont, it quite simply won't be passed, so if we can't get the Abortion Act extended now, we may not get it in the near future at all. As the info below highlights, women in NI put themselves in all sorts of risks that women in the rest of the UK don't simply by not having abortion on demand. It's estimated that 40 women a week leave NI to have an abortion which identifies a clear need for the Act to be extended.



PLEASE HELP.
best wishes

Phelim







Apologies for cross-posting



The news from London is that the government is trying to get the abortion amendments in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill voted on a lot sooner than anyone expected – perhaps as early as 20th May. For those of you who didn't know, there is likely to be an amendment that tries to extend the 1967 Abortion Act to Northern Ireland .



The Sec of State for NI, Shaun Woodward, has written to Gordon Brown to tell him that there is no support here for the extension of the Act. The Family Planning Association has produced thousands of postcards to Gordon Brown to tell him that is not true. If you phone 0845 122 8687, they will send you as many of postcards as you want to distribute among friends etc. Here in Derry , we are using them on street stalls and getting a good response.



But you don’t have to leave your computer to fight for this basic right for women. Send this email to everyone you know and ask them to write to the email addresses below (one email can be sent to all the addresses). Ask those MPs to support extension of the Abortion Act to NI and to ensure that 40 years after the NHS started providing abortions in Britain , women here finally get the right to choose.

It's vital to include your full name and postcode or they will ignore the email.



primarolod@parliament.uk,



woodwards@parliament.uk



opikl@parliament.uk ,



harrise@parliament.uk ,



tongj@parliament.uk,



mccaffertyc@parliament.uk



hoeyk@parliament.uk



bloodm@parliament.uk,



alderdicej@parliament.uk,



hermons@parliament.uk,



coopery@parliament.uk,



stuartg@parliament.uk ,



If you have time to email Gordon Brown also, you can do that at

http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/page821.asp



Those of you are active in a trade union, especially UNISON, UNITE or NIPSA, get onto your union office and ask them to write to Shaun Woodward, Gordon Brown and Dawn Primarolo (Minister for Public Health) as soon as possible to inform them of the union support for extension of the Abortion Act to NI.





Among the things you might want to include in your email are:



Women in Northern Ireland have no right to abortion, even if they are pregnant as a result of rape or incest.


In NI, it’s one law for the rich another for the poor. Anyone who has the money can get an abortion. Approx 40 women a week leave NI for to end unwanted pregnancies. About half go to Britain , the rest to Europe where the procedure is considerably cheaper.


The difficulties of raising this money means women from NI having abortions in Britain are three times more likely than their British sisters to have an abortion after 20 weeks. If abortion was available on the NHS, as in Britain , most abortions would take place before 10 weeks of pregnancy.


Some women will try to cause an abortion themselves.11% of NI’s GPs say they have seen the results of amateur abortions.


There are women who will despair and kill, or try to kill, themselves. These are likely to be the poorest women who cannot get the money together to pay for an abortion.


It is not true that “no one here supports abortion rights”. All the larger trade unions: UNISON, UNITE and NIPSA have policies that support extension of the Act. Some politicians mutter that these are British unions “imposing” their views on us, this is nonsense. The policies were passed at Irish or NI regional conferences and NIPSA – the largest union in the region – organises only in NI.


Women here have the same kind of sex lives, same chance of an unwanted pregnancy and same attitude to abortion as women in Britain or the South of Ireland.
We stopped the fundamentalists when they tried to prevent civil partnership being brought into NI by this kind of email campaign. We can do the same now on abortion.

Monday, May 12, 2008

Green Left Agenda



Agenda first draft for our 24th May meeting...you can join Green Left if you are a Green Party member...there is an Australian version of GL in the Australian Green Party and several left groups in Les Verts...talk of putting together a GL in Scotland as well.

GREEN LEFT MEETINGS, CONFERENCES and EVENTS


Agenda Items for the AGM (more suggestions welcome)

1. Minutes of last agm if available
2. Finances
3. Election of new Committee: Nominations
4. "Gleft/London Federation of Green parties congratulates the Durban dockers of the South African Transport and Allied Workers Union (Satawu), and the police trade union (POPCRU) members who supported them for turning away the Chinese arms shipment to Zimbabwe where it might be used to attack trades unionists and others engaged in the struggle for democratic rights in Zimbabwe. We note that such action would be illegal if taken by British Trades unionists and call for a restoration of the rights of British trades unionists to take solidarity action with other groups nationally and internationally."

Prop P.Murry sec John Carver (PP: GPTU)
5. Population /migration motion possibly

"Any population policy is only acceptable if it
1. rejects the notion of setting a target population for the UK
2. calls on gov't to build and adapt ecologically friendly housing stock to be provided affordably on a basis of social need
3. calls for immediate international negotiations on world population size, distribution and migration, in view of the fact that a climate change refugee problem is already starting, adding to the push and pull factors caused by gross international inequality."
6. Motion a public statement of support for NUT/UCU/PCS
7. Support for Hugo Blanco (see http://www.socialistvoice.ca/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/blanco-indigenous.pdf)
8. Anti-Fascism

Phelim Mac Caferty writes: How about anti-fascism? Given Richard 'gay porn film' Barnbrook getting a seat on the LA, think we need motion on continuing, deepening and broadening work against the BNP, to discredit them in office, campaign that this is their first and last 4 years on London's Assembly and to stop them at all costs from getting a seat in Europe.
9. Forthcoming events
1. Heathrow Demo May 31st (http://www.campaigncc.org/heathrow.shtml)
2. GPTU conference July 12th 10-6, Friends' Meeting House, Ship Street, Brighton, Sussex BN1 1AF (10 minutes from Brighton BR), TEL (01273) 770258 website http://www.brightonquakers.co.uk/

SPEAKERS
* Caroline Lucas MEP,
* Tony Kearns (CWU),
* Kate Greene (CPAG)



Workshops
1. Migration/ Population policy and International relations (J.Healy)
2. Future strategies for links between Greens and TUs (P. MacCafferty)

Admission £8 / £4 concs
3. Tolpuddle
4. Compass
5. Convention of the Left
10. AOB


Green Left members have also been involved in organising the Campaign Against Climate Change Trades Union conferences and organising CACCTU fringes at TU conference and another CACCTU conference in 2009.

Sunday, May 11, 2008

'The Joy of Soil Science' 'More Joy of Soil Science@



....In summary, it would appear th
at the lowly earthworm and still lowlier soil nematodes respond to increases in the air's CO2 content, via a number of plant-mediated phenomena, in ways that further enhance the positive effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on plant growth and development, while at the same time helping to sequester more carbon more securely in the soil and thereby reducing the potential for CO2-induced global warming.
Worm Man


Socialists in Australia argue not about what they think of the SWP but undertake serious discussions about soil science...this is a reason to be cheerful

I have pasted this in from Dave Riley's blog comments...if people are debating soil science there is hope...essentially worm bin compost has huge potential however low nutrient soils can be very ecologically important as well.

An important debate....I am king of the compost in Winkfield, Windsor by the way...my neighbours are giving me their grass clippings and the compost is cooking nicely.

I just have to kill the puta madre slugs...no easy task...any way look at the debate in Australia below


On May 09, Dave Riley said...
I agree. There has to be ecological logic to the landscape RE-design.

As well as protecting habitat we need to enlarge the native flora corridors. But in , I guess most,intensely farmed districts soil degradation & exotic invasion is such that a lot of that aspiration will be almost utopian.

You just have to fly over the East Coast of Australia to get a sense of the massive loss. As for the Murray Darling Basin....!

My view -- at least for the moment -- is that if farmers are going to farm the land then we have to establish certain parameters that protect them and their income as well as the environment. We also have to take great swathes of land out of food and fibre production for the regrowth of natural habitat.

The problem is that to do that we have to ask farmers to produce differently with less land and, to some significantly degree, more productively while being more sustainable.

Tall order.

I think that is sure to be a massive economic and social headache as in effect we have to completely redesign the rural landscape and its utilisation. And do that with the cooperation of farmers.

If you check out The Carbon Coalition -- assuming the science is correct -- you can see the problem with such a shift. There has to be financial return -- otherwise it won't happen.

And these farmers are calling for a carbon trading scheme!

While it may be practicable to take degraded rural land out of production, reforest riparian ecosystems, and guarantee produce prices -- the contradiction is likely to be that we have to repopulate the countryside and make farming more labour intensive.

So in region after region there would need to be a range of experimental model projects to prove that such a shift is viable.We'd also have to deal with the challenge of a buy back or land nationalisation (of the big corps) scheme -- while guaranteeing working farmers land tenure.

As for the live stock industry -- if we cannot establish a viable anti-fart campaign for ruminants then we'd need to massively cut stock numbers. Thats' what? An industry farming something like 100 million sheep and 80 million cattle.

So the concept of the 'free range' herd/flock may have to be dropped as livestock are more actively integrated with mixed farming approaches as we shave back their numbers.

Reducing beef consumption may be one key element for instance. Do that and the economies of the outback begin to collapse...

If you take a sample such as the Murray Darling basin -- obviously an emergency situation already exists there -- we'd have to consider a massive almost militarised program of aggressive reforestation born up by thousands of people recruited to plant trees.

We could mobilise school students and the like and make it a national focus. It could be a marker of the changes more generally to come. But we'd need to do it that way to protect future food supplies and save the river systems which are dying.

But planting trees may not be the panacea it's cracked up to be especially in areas of salination. We may have to remodel the land somewhat to drain salt away as well as look to other sources of water catchment than by draining the main tributaries. If we decide that a sustainable flow down the Darling or whatever is so many percentiles more than is currently the case that water has to come from somewhere. The irony is , I guess, that because of run off, deforestration and erosion maybe more water runs into the river systems after good rain than previously despite the fact that the ecology is under so much duress.

So I imagine that "carbon farming" makes a lot of sense in that context as part of the landscape. And in all areas any reforestration program has to proceed , I guess, by a staged process of planting first colonizer species(eg: local wattles) before fostering in other natives.

On May 09, Ben Courtice said...
Of course we must use vermiculture etc to build up the soils in farmland. And in some areas (e.g. New England tableland perhaps) that may have had rich and deep humus before European invasion we could consider programs to re-enrich soils maybe (I'm no expert either, I'm just guessing). The organic farming model has far less impact than chemical industrial farming.

However, my only point is that weed eradication and native re-vegetation projects are required on a large scale, and it is desirable to reclaim some existing farmland for this just to re-establish sufficient habitat for the growing number of threatened species (and threatened ecosystems, in fact).

On May 07, Dave Riley said...
Soil ecology is complex I agree and I'm not about to know much about it. But the problem is being driven by the reality of climate change and how that relates to agricultural production and soil sequestration.

Technically you could convert "soil" to any thing -- offering various attributes-- by the addition of any amount of biological material and fiddling with the local ecology.

The introduction of cloved hoofed animals has had a major, and disastrous, impact on Australian soils and it seems to me that even there if we are to farm them it "may" be preferable to change the soil (and pasture)to suit their impact and 'weight' otherwise you have to consider banning them from the landscape altogether (ESP with more droughts likely).

Weeds are a massive problem and I'm amazed how much effort is required to weed, say, one river valley using any number of tactics as part of full time eradication programs.

While I'm all for a sort of Land Care emergency program with a mobilisation of huge numbers of workers in the effort, to some degree we have to accept that we're stuck with the changes that have already happened and "perch" our new soil attributes and requirements on top of that.

Mark Diesendorf has some interesting commentary for instance about sustainable bio-energy production in regard to already existing soils and tandem with food production (eg: Western Australian malee) using local flora and agricultural biomass..

I'm not sure that we can harness the flora and fauna for food consumption as broadly as some have suggested. Acacia seeds -- yes. More kangaroo perhaps.And its preferable to eat macedonian nuts to the demanding almond... But the reality is that the sort of farming we need for sustainability won't require all the space that is now utilised.

Inasmuch as this relates to worms -- Australian worms aren't very useful in agriculture in the same way as they have limited capacity to help grow the larder. So the worms you know (in your backyard or on the vegey farm)are in fact, European or African in origin in the same way that the many grasses and weeds are exotic.

So it's a bit of a false god to talk about returning all the landscape to an absolute native eco-systems.

So if you wanted to use the soil to sequest carbon and foster sustainable production then you are talking about the soil that is being intensely farmed for food or fibre and weigh that up with the gains you can attain even though the end product ecosystem won't be indigenous.

On May 07, Ben Courtice said...
If you want to "invigorate the extremely poor nature of Australian soils" be warned that on a broad enough scale this would threaten to really disrupt the native ecosystems which are highly specialised in dealing with said poor soils. I know of a place on the East coast of Tasmania where scrub forest grows on soil that is so barren virtually nothing farm-like would take root. Defined agricultural areas, sure, but Australian soils have already been irreparably damaged in at least two ways since European invasion: firstly, massive topsoil loss caused by the introduction of hooved livestock; and secondly, massive invasion of green, leafy foreign weeds which already change the soil composition as they grow and take over from natives. I read not long ago that in native re-vegetation projects landcare workers have even used heavy sugar application on the soil. This stimulates soil bacteria growth, which bacteria use up a lot of the available nitrogen, starving the introduced species for a period of a couple of months until some natives can be established in the friendlier nitrogen-depleted soil.

On May 07, Worm Man said...
CO2 Science -- the Worm Digest..But the good news doesn't end there. As Jongmans et al. (2003) point out, "the rate of organic matter decomposition can be decreased in worm casts compared to bulk soil aggregates (Martin, 1991; Haynes and Fraser, 1998)." Hence, on the basis of these studies and their own micro-morphological investigation of structural development and organic matter distribution in two calcareous marine loam soils on which pear trees had been grown for 45 years (one of which soils exhibited little to no earthworm activity and one of which exhibited high earthworm activity, due to different levels of heavy metal contamination of the soils as a consequence of the prior use of different amounts of fungicides), they concluded that "earthworms play an important role in the intimate mixing of organic residues and fine mineral soil particles and the formation of organic matter-rich micro-aggregates and can, therefore, contribute to physical protection of organic matter, thereby slowing down organic matter turnover and increasing the soil's potential for carbon sequestration." Put more simply, atmospheric CO2 enrichment that stimulates the activity of earthworms also leads to more -- and more secure -- sequestration of carbon in earth's soils, thereby reducing the potential for CO2-induced global warming.

But there's still more to the story of CO2 and worms. In an intriguing research paper published in Soil Biology & Biochemsitry, Cole et al. (2002) report that "in the peatlands of northern England, which are classified as blanket peat, it has been suggested that the potential effects of global warming on carbon and nutrient dynamics will be related to the activities of dominant soil fauna, and especially enchytraeid worms." In harmony with these ideas, Cole et al. say they "hypothesized" that warming would lead to increased enchytraeid worm activity, which would lead to higher grazing pressure on microbes in the soil; and since enchytraeid grazing has been observed to enhance microbial activity (Cole et al., 2000), they further hypothesized that more carbon would be liberated in dissolved organic form, "supporting the view that global warming will increase carbon loss from blanket peat ecosystems."

....In summary, it would appear that the lowly earthworm and still lowlier soil nematodes respond to increases in the air's CO2 content, via a number of plant-mediated phenomena, in ways that further enhance the positive effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on plant growth and development, while at the same time helping to sequester more carbon more securely in the soil and thereby reducing the potential for CO2-induced global warming.

Not a bad day's work for something some of us only use as bait for catching fish
!

FIDEL CASTRO highlights the latest military plotting by Washington.

I hope I am this politically active and on the case when I am 80.

I fear when I am 80 we will all be on the set of Mad Max, with roving bands led by Tina Turner fighting over tanks of biofuel in the deserts of Berkshire.


I will probably have to learn how to fire a cross bow so that people don't steal my compost.....oh well. This being Windsor, the Royal Family will hole up in the castle and oppress the local feudal population..Les Vampires continue to vamp plus la change.

I predict by 2046 we will have a Green Party government in England and Wales.

Or may be just may be the best of the Latin American ecoleft will restore green civilisation and we will live well. Anyway on to Fidel

The 4th intervention fleet
(Thursday 08 May 2008)
FIDEL CASTRO


IT came into being in 1943 as a means of combating nazi submarines and protecting navigation routes during the second world war.

It was decommissioned in 1950, when it became superfluous. The US Southern Command was designed to meet Washington's hegemonic needs in our region at the time.

After 48 years, however, the Fourth Fleet has been resurrected and its interventionist aims need not be proved - US military chiefs themselves divulge this in a natural, spontaneous and, at times, discrete fashion.

The decision to reassemble the Fourth Fleet was announced in the first week of April, almost a month after Ecuadorian territory had been attacked by Colombia using US bombs and technology and owing to US pressure, killing or wounding citizens of several countries.

This act was vigorously condemned by Latin American leaders at the Rio Group meeting held in the Dominican Republic's capital.

Worst still, the fleet's establishment comes at a time when the dismemberment of Bolivia, encouraged by the United States, has attracted nearly unanimous condemnation.

US military chiefs themselves have explained that they will be responsible for over 30 countries and for covering 15.6 million square miles of neighbouring waters in both central and south America, the Caribbean Sea and its 12 islands, Mexico and the European territories this side of the Atlantic.

The US has 10 Nimitz aircraft carriers whose parameters, more or less similar, are: a maximum load capacity of between 101,000 and 104,000 tons, a 999-feet-long and 230.4-feet-wide deck, two nuclear reactors, a maximum speed of 35 miles per hour and capacity for 90 war planes.

The last Nimitz ship to be commissioned bears the name of George HW Bush, the current president's father. It has already been baptised with a bottle of champagne by the progenitor himself and should be ready to join the other vessels in coming months.

No other country in the world can boast of vessels like these. They are equipped with sophisticated nuclear weapons and able to get within a few miles of any of our countries.

The next aircraft carrier to be commissioned, the USS Gerald Ford, will be a new type of vessel which employs stealth technologies that cannot be detected by radar and electromagnetic weapons.

The main manufacturer of the two types of vessels is Northrop Grumman, whose current president is also a member of the board of directors of the US oil company Chevron-Texaco. The last Nimitz cost six billion dollars. This did not include the cost of the planes, projectiles or operations, which can also reach figures in the billions.

It sounds like a science fiction story. With that money, the lives of millions of children could have been saved.

What is the declared objective of the 4th Fleet? "To combat terrorism and illegal activities such as drug trafficking," not to mention sending a message to Venezuela and the rest of the region. It has been announced that it will begin operations next July 1.

Head of the Southern Command US Navy Admiral James Stavrides has stated that the US needs to work harder in "the market of ideas, to win over the hearts and minds" of the people in the region.

The US has already deployed the Second, Third, Fifth, Sixth and Seventh fleets in the Western Atlantic, Eastern Pacific, Middle Eastern, Mediterranean, Eastern Atlantic and Western Pacific Oceans. The Fourth Fleet was needed to patrol all the seas worldwide.

The US has a total of nine Nimitz aircraft carriers active or nearly ready for combat, such as the George HW Bush.

It has sufficient reserves to triple or quadruple the power of any of its fleets in a given theatre of operations.

The aircraft carriers and nuclear bombs that our countries are threatened with serve to spread terror and death, but not to combat terrorism and illegal activities.

They should also serve to fill the empire's lackeys with shame and strengthen solidarity among the world's peoples.

Fidel Castro Ruz is former president of Cuba.

Tupac Lives!


Most current struggles of indigenous campesinos are against the killing of Pachamama, Mother Earth; against depredations by the large companies, mainly mining, but also petroleum and gas. Previous Peruvian governments were servants of feudal lords; today they serve the great multinationals. They act against the Peruvian people and against nature.

Living conditions are another cause of struggle. There is more and more unemployment, and the standard of living is falling. In the countryside this is due to excessively low prices for farm products. This is linked to the struggle against the Free Trade Agreement with the United States that will demolish our agriculture for the benefit of large, subsidized imperial firms.


I am going to be blogging from the Socialist Voice pamphlet written by Hugo Blanco. Hugo Blanco led the peasant uprising in Peru in the 1960s, a former follower of Trotsky...he is a firm advocate of ecosocialism.

Ecosocialism has some strong and determined activist in the UK, for example, Aled Fisher as LSE SU head is an advance but it is strongest in Latin America...strongest amongst the indigenous people.

Indigenous people are conscious of ecology in a very direct way and have been utterly oppressed for centuries...but right across Latin America they are rising and taking power....their struggle is one of the most important good news stories on the planet.

Serious Greens most learn from them and provide solidarity. Time to ditch the patronising 'Rainbow Warrior' cliches...

Socialists have much to learn. Deborah Simmons from the Canadian New Socialist Group has argued

We owe a particular debt to indigenous peoples, who throughout the inhumane and environmentally destructive history of capitalism have shown that there are alternative ways of organizing society. This was the basis for Karl Marx’s fascination with indigenous societies – in particular the society of the Iroquois – during the last years of his life. This egalitarian and democratic people provided him with insights into the concrete possibility of a free society.


Karl Marx investigate indigenous economic systems with care (see Karl Marx and the Iroquois) ....like Marx, Blanco argues that we must embrace'modern advances that do no harm ' but be profoundly conscious of ecological ways of living.

Ecosocialist need to spread the word about the indigenous struggle...they are the cutting edge of the Latin American left.

The words of the great Peruvian socialist José Carlos Mariátegui are worth remembering "Certainly, we do not wish that Socialism in America be a tracing and a copy. It must be a heroic creation.
We must, with our own reality, in our own language, bring Indoamerican socialism to life."


- in 'Aniversario y balance', Amauta no. 26 (17 Sept., 1928)

You may have seen this from Blanco as well:

At first sight, environmentalists or conservationists are nice, slightly crazy guys whose main purpose in life is to prevent the disappearance of blue whales or pandas. The common people have more important things to think about, for instance how to get their daily bread. […] However, there are in Peru a very large number of people who are environmentalists […] they might reply, ‘ecologist your mother’, or words to that effect. […] Are not the town of Ilo and the surrounding villages which are being polluted by the Southern Peru Copper Corporation truly environmentalist? Is not the village of Tambo Grande in Pirura environmentalist when it rises like a closed fist and is ready to die in order to prevent strip-mining in its valley? Also, the people of the Mantaro Valley who saw their little sheep die, because of the smoke and waste from La Oroya smelter. (Hugo Blanco quoted in Guha and Martinez-Alier 1997: 24)

The essay below is taken from one of a number of inspiring new pamphlets from Socialist Voice (the Canadian group who put the cool back into socialismo!).

You can get them here for free, take a look!


The Epic Struggle of Indigenous Andean-Amazonian Culture
(Socialist Voice, August 15, 2007)
Over the course of more than 10,000 years, the rich biodiversity of the An­des-Amazon region has created a culture that is closely interlocked with Pachamama (Mother Nature). This culture is marked by deep knowledge of nature and is highly agricultural. Ours is one of the seven zones of the world to have originated agriculture. It has yielded the greatest variety of domes­ticated species. This has given rise to a cosmic vision different from the Western outlook that views the creator as a superior immaterial spirit who created man in his image and likeness and created nature to serve him. For the indigenous cosmic vision, humanity is a daughter of and part of Mother Earth. We must live in her bosom in harmony with her. Each hill or peak, each river, each vegetable or animal species has a spirit.

Indigenous, collectivist mentality is strong enough to have endured sol­idly through 500 years of invasion and the dictatorship of individualism.

The Quechua and Aymara name for the campesino community is ayllu. It is bound by strong ties, many expressed in work (ayni, mink’a, faena)[1] and in all aspects of life. The community is not restricted to persons. It entails a close communal relationship with cultivated species, with me­dicinal species, with animals and plants that tell cultivators about seasonal variations,[2] and, more broadly, with all animal and vegetable species, with rain, and with the land.

The development of agriculture and tending of livestock, which in other latitudes led to slavery and feudalism, led in Abya Yala (the Americas) to new forms of collectivism. In the Andes zone it led to a state that extended over the territories of six present-day countries – Tawantinsuyo (called “em­pire” by the invaders out of the same ignorance that led them to call the llama “big sheep.”)

It’s true that the new forms of collectivism gave rise to privileged castes and wars of conquest. But in no part of the continent was production based on slave labor or the feudal system.

For more than 10,000 years our culture domesticated 182 plant spe­cies, including around 3,500 potato varieties.

Our people know 4,500 medicinal plants.

Tawantinsuyos planned agriculture based on a system of watersheds and micro watersheds or basins. They built long aqueducts, taking care to avoid land erosion.
Terracing was practiced on the slopes and “waru-waru”[3] in the alti­plano [highlands].[4] Special technologies were used from zone to zone.

Across the entire Tawantinsuyo territory they created storage buildings (qolqa) to supply food to the population whenever some climatic shift un­dermined agriculture.
Although there were privileged castes, hunger and misery did not exist. Orphans, persons with disabilities, and the elderly were cared for by the community.

The invasion

The backbone of this social organization, of the agricultural infrastructure and food reserves, was crushed by the invasion.

Europe was then passing from feudalism to capitalism. The invasion was a capitalist action. They came looking for spices, believing they had reached India. They found none, but did find gold and silver.

Mining had existed as a marginal activity, but it now became the center of the economy. To exploit the mines they used a system worse than slavery. The slave owner is concerned about the health of his slave just as he’s inter­ested in the health of his donkey. The mine owner in Peru received annually a certain quantity of indigenous people in order to “indoctrinate” them. Re­gardless of how many of them died, the next year he would receive the same number. Hence, youth and adults were sent into the mines and never left until they died. Because of this, young indigenous people committed suicide and mothers killed their children to free them from torment. This practice diminished following the Tupac Amaru rebellion.

Agricultural work took place through a feudal system. The Europeans took the best lands from the community and converted them into latifundios (huge estates or latifundia). Community inhabitants became serfs on their own lands. They had to work freely for the feudal lord in exchange for per­mission to cultivate a small plot for their own needs.

For many reasons a huge decline in agriculture took place:
Canals, terracing, and waru-warus were destroyed because of igno­rance and lack of care.
Until this day no planning in terms of watersheds and micro water­sheds has been carried out. Chaos took hold and persists.

With the importation of foreign domestic animals to the zone, the en­vironment deteriorated. The auquenidos (camelid)[5] cut pasture grass with their teeth, but cows, horses, and sheep uproot it.

The invaders vented their superstitions on our crops. Our agricultural mentality didn’t suit their cultured ways. So the “exterminators of idolaters” went after plants like the papa, also known as Santa Padre (Holy Father). They renamed it patata, the word used in Spain. This passed into English and other languages as “potato.” They also damned kiwicha or amaranto (amaranth).The coca plant, which the famous doctor Hipólito Unanue called the “supertonic of the vegetable kingdom,” is to this day the target of super­stition and excessively harmful prejudice in “refined” circles.

The invaders pillaged the food stockpiles located across the territory to cope with times of hunger brought on by climatic irregularities.

Taking their behavior as a whole, we find that European imposition of hunger and misery — their cultural contribution — was even more deadly than their massacres and the smallpox they spread among us.


Rebellions and republic


From the beginning, our people rebelled against the invaders. Numerous insur­rections took place, beginning with Tupac Amaru II’s rebellion. It spread all the way to Bolivia and lasted even after his cruel torture and assassination.
Later the so-called Independence Revolution took place. It did not signify any noticeable change for the indigenous population.

The generals of “independence” were awarded “haciendas” (the new name for the feudal latifundia), “Indians” and all.
The hacienda system consisted basically of the free labor of the colono (serf) for the hacienda. There were other aspects to this serfdom.
The colono had to turn over some of his animals that grazed on natural pastures to the master. He made long treks with pack mules burdened with hacienda produce. They lasted days and he had to sleep out in the open. The owner mistreated him physically and morally. He could jail him and rape the women. The serf’s children did not go to school either because they had to work, or there were no schools, or the master forbade it.


Our land struggle in the 1960s

The hacienda feudal system lasted until the second half of the last century.The spread of capitalism to the countryside weakened it in many ways:
New large-scale mining absorbed labor from the haciendas.
New mechanized latifundia expelled the serfs and employed an agri­cultural proletariat.
New high-priced crops required more labor time, pressing the haci­enda owner to demand more work from his serfs and to expel them in order to take over their plots.

The serfs, on the other hand, needed more time for their own labours and resisted the theft of their plots.

We organized ourselves to struggle against the new outrages. Given the intransigence of the landlords, the struggle became a fight for possession of the land. Our defensive action not only set us against the landlords but also against the government which defended the feudal system.

In over 100 haciendas we refused to work for the landlords. But we con­tinued to work our own plots. This was in practice an agrarian reform. The government repressed us with arms and we defended ourselves with arms. The military government of the day crushed the armed self-defense; but it took note that it would be impossible to re-implant feudal serfdom. It opted to pass an agrarian reform law — only in this zone — legalizing campesino possession of the land. But indigenous campesinos in other zones of the country rebelled and took over haciendas. This was violently repressed, but could not be effectively contained. Hence, a subsequent reformist military government felt obliged to decree an agrarian reform at the national level.
In this way, we took advantage of capitalism’s weakening of the feudal system to take over the land. In this same epoch the Brazilian campesino movement was shattered. Capitalism triumphed there. Its victims are now struggling courageously in the “Landless Rural Workers’ Movement.”

For this reason Peru is, with the likely exception of Cuba, the country of the continent with the greatest proportion of landowners, either of commu­nal or private plots. Some campesinos from the epoch of struggle for the land feel the qualita­tive change. “Now we are free,” they say. They consider that breaking down feudal servitude also broke them free from the yoke that had gripped them.
Following the rupture they worked for education, building schools and pay­ing men and women teachers. Later they fought to get the state to pay them. They built health centres and fought to get the state to pay for health services.

They got the vote and elected their own mayors. They fought against min­ing pollution. They struggled to assume in a collective manner police and judicial functions, to replace corrupt cops and judges. They fought against corrupt authorities of any stripe — and for many other things.

They feel that breaking from feudal servitude freed them to spread wings and carry the struggle forward.


Current struggles

Most current struggles of indigenous campesinos are against the killing of Pachamama, Mother Earth; against depredations by the large companies, mainly mining, but also petroleum and gas. Previous Peruvian governments were servants of feudal lords; today they serve the great multinationals. They act against the Peruvian people and against nature.

Living conditions are another cause of struggle. There is more and more unemployment, and the standard of living is falling. In the countryside this is due to excessively low prices for farm products. This is linked to the struggle against the Free Trade Agreement with the United States that will demolish our agriculture for the benefit of large, subsidized imperial firms.

The indigenous movement, together with the rest of the Peruvian popula­tion, is fighting against corruption and to get their own representatives into local governments. People often suffer betrayals because there is no system for authentic democratic control.

The indigenous movement is not alone. Although it is the most vigor­ous and persevering, it is not unique. The rest of the people are struggling together with us.


Intellectuals called indigenistas, whether indigenous or not, merit special mention. Ever since the oppression of the original peoples of our continent began there have been individuals who have struggled against it and to de­fend our culture.
The work of Father Bartolomé de las Casas is known.

In Peru there were notable political figures like González Prada and Mariátegui. Writers like Clorinda Matto, Ciro Alegría, José María Arguedas. Painters like José Sabogal. Musicians like Alomía Robles, Baltasar Zegarra, Roberto Ojeda, Leandro Alviña, and so on.

The meaning of our struggle

We are defending our culture in its diverse aspects: our cosmic vision, social organization, our rituals and agricultural know-how, medicine, music, lan­guage, and many others.

We do not claim that our culture is superior to others. We are struggling to stop it from being considered inferior. We want to be respected as equals.

We have been educated to harmonize equality and diversity. Peru is a mega-diverse country, both geographically and demographically. We have 82% of the world’s 103 natural life zones. Our inhabitants speak 45 different languages. The great Inca Sun God celebration was not exclusive. It had a procession of different peoples with diverse gods. The notion of “one God” did not exist. We are for the equality of the diverse; we are against homog­enization (igualitarismo).

On the one hand we respect diverse individualities and particularities. On the other, we oppose individualism. Ours is a culture of solidarity.
We don’t seek a return to the past. We know we must make the best in general of advances in human culture.

That does not contradict our resolve to go back to our own roots. Our past will be vividly present in our future.

We love and care for Pachamama. We fervently yearn to return to basing our economy on our rich biodiversity, through agriculture and natural medi­cine, along with any modern advances that do no harm.

We don’t want our social system to be based on the deep-seated, antiso­cial individualism that the invaders brought here. We intend to recover and strengthen at all levels the vigorous, collectivist solidarity and fraternity of the ayllu, making use, as well, of universal knowledge that is not harmful.

We dream that the past 500 years of crushing blows are just a passing nightmare in the ten thousand years of building our culture.

Reference Notes
[1]. These terms from a collectivist language are not translatable to an individualist one. Ayni means the mutual lending of work, as collective activity for the benefit of an individual. Faena is collective work for collective benefit. Mink’a is asking for a service with profuse and warm urgings.
[2]. There are “signs” that tell indigenous campesinos how climate or weather conditions may change or how a given crop may fare. Abundant or poor blossoming of a forest plant, the coloration of snakes, the height of bird nests, the greater or lesser brilliance of a constellation, etc.
[3]. Waru-waru is the practice of alternating belts of elevated fields and ditches (or swales); planting is done on the elevated belts. This has the function of avoiding floods in rainy years. In dry years water held in the ditches is used for irrigation. Heat absorbed by ditch water during the day helps to counteract cold nights at frost time.
[4]. [Translator’s Note] A good description of this agricultural technology can be found at http://carbon.hampshire.edu/~hms/Articles%20for%20Maja/EnvNatAndes.doc. Here is an excerpt from the essay Environment and Nature in South America: the Central Andes:
“The local agro-pastoralists constructed raised fields systems or waru-waru and sunken smaller garden patches or qochas to address these problems. Construction of raised, ridged fields, with swales or canals between the ridges, resulted in ridge-top areas above the waterlogged soils in the rainy season, eliminating rot among the tubers. Both the qocha system and the intervening canals among the raised fields trapped rainwater, which was curated through the dry season to provide a continuing water supply.

“In addition to managing moisture, these systems also ameliorated temperature extremes. Thus the raised field patterns, and furrows in the qochas, were constructed either parallel to, or perpendicular to, the path of the sun, an orientation which permitted maximum solar energy capture by the water. This water kept the fields slightly warmer at night, and often radiated enough heat to prevent frost damage while the surrounding unmodified grasslands suffered heavy freezes.”
[5]. Auquenidos (camelid) are animals found in the Andes mountains, relatives of the camels. They are also called camelidos in Spanish. In Peru there are four different auquenidos: llamas, alpacas, vicuñas and guanacos. Llamas and guanacos are beasts of burden, while alpacas and vicuñas are used for their wool.


Dear friends:

Thanks to the support of Socialist Voice readers, our new publishing program is off to a fast start. We've published seven new pamphlets, and new editions of three older ones:

*

Anti-Semitism, Zionism, and the Defense of Palestinian Rights
*

Canada's Assault on Afghanistan: Behind the Lies and Cover-ups
*

Comintern: Revolutionary Internationalism in Lenin's Time
*

Cuba in a Time of Transition
*

Hugo Blanco on the Fight for Indigenous Rights in the Andes Today
*

Fidel Castro on Global Warming, Biofuels and World Hunger
*

From Resistance to Power! Indigenous Manifestos from Central and South America
*

Haiti and the Myth of Canadian Peacekeeping
*

Venezuela Eyewitness
*

Venezuela and the International Struggle for Socialism

These pamphlets are available now in two formats:

1. PROFESSIONALLY PRINTED COPIES can be purchased (at very reasonable prices!) by mail from South Branch Publications. Download and print the Order Form from the Socialist Voice Publications Page.

2. FREE PDF COPIES can also be downloaded from the Socialist Voice Publications Page.

Thank you again for helping to make more Socialist Voice articles available to the broadest possible audience.

Roger Annis and John Riddell

PS: The Publications page also features two new Climate and Capitalism pamphlets —

*

Confronting the Climate Change Crisis
*

How to Avoid Action on Climate Change