The conceit of the quantum physics book of explaining to the dog is stupid but fun too.
Much of this I don't understand but I guess if I keep reading something will rub off.
More seriously it fits with my more lengthy posts recently on epistemology, the question of how do we know what we know, here and here.
Clearly while I am committed to both rationality and materialism, what we mean by matter is up for debate and any one with any kind of mathematics knows that things get seriously weird quite quickly when rationality based upon mathematical formalism comes into play. So while we should eschew anything goes relativism (if that is really a thing rather than an accusation) rationality ain't what it used to be either.
Quantum uncertainty is a fundamental limit on what can be known, arising from the fact that quantum objects have both particle and wave properties.Looking forward to gradually eroding my ignorance by reading the rest of this title! And just because its science doesn't mean that it is certain.
Uncertainty is also the first place where quantum physics coincides with philosophy. The idea of fundamental limits to measurement runs directly counter to the goals and foundations of classical physics. Dealing with quantum uncertainty requires a complete rethinking of the basis of physics,
(Orzel 2013: 46)