7 Sept 2009

Right wing violence and disinformation in Bolivia

This is from the ever excellent Green Left Weekly

‘It is possible to build a better world’

Federico Fuentes, Sao Paulo
5 September 2009

As Bolivia heads towards its December 6 national elections, the right-wing opposition has again turned to violence and disinformation to try to halt the process of change led by the country’s first indigenous president, Evo Morales.

On August 11, letter bombs sent to social movements were discovered and deactivated.

One of the bombs detonated in the hands of the wife of Fidel Surco, a leader of the National Coalition for Change, which unites most of Bolivia’s indigenous, peasant, worker and popular organisations. She was hospitalised and treated for severe damage to her hands and eyes.

Sergio Loayza, vice president of Morales’ Movement Towards Socialism party (MAS), said “[these] violent acts of terrorism are aimed at frightening our leaders” because the right wing knows “that they cannot win the elections”.

Together with Rosaria Apaza, from the MAS national leadership, Loayza spoke to Green Left Weekly at an international seminar organised in Sao Paulo, Brazil by the Socialism and Liberty Party over August 17-18.

The letter bombs came only months after a terrorist cell made up of foreign and Bolivian mercenaries was disbanded in April in the city of Santa Cruz, the heartland of the right-wing opposition.

The mercenaries were found with plans to assassinate Morales and members of his cabinet. A cache of rifles, munitions, and plastic explosives was also discovered.

Since then it has been revealed that right-wing opposition leaders had funded the terrorist cell.

In September 2008, the rich elites of Santa Cruz, together with right-wing prefects (governors) from the other opposition controlled departments (states) in Bolivia’s east, were involved in violent takeovers of government buildings in the region, as part of a coup attempt against the Morales government.

After the massacre of dozens of indigenous peasants in the state of Pando, the Morales government ordered the military to move in against the coup-plotters. At the same time, the nation’s progressive social movements mobilised to go to Santa Cruz, threatening to take over the city.

The combined action by the government and the social movements caused the defeat of the coup attempt.

This opened the way for the approval of a new constitution, which was ratified in a national referendum with 60% support in January.

The new constitution radically increased the rights of indigenous people and recognised state control of Bolivia’s natural resources.

“For us, the December 6 elections are very important”, said Loayza. “We want to ratify our indigenous President Evo Morales and our vice president Alvaro Garcia Linera, and above all guarantee a two-thirds majority” in the national assembly.

“Until now, although we have controlled the executive power, the government, this has not been enough. The judiciary is controlled [by the right wing]; they control the Senate too.

“That is why more than 100 laws that the executive has sent to the Senate have been blocked. It has only been due to the mobilisation of the social movements that we have been able to approve some laws. That is why it is important that we win a majority in the Senate.

“This is the body where we will be able to put the new constitution into practice. We want to consolidate this process and we will only be able to do this as long as we have the necessary support at the national level.

“That is why they know perfectly well that for them this is do or die, and for us as well.”

In this context, “the social organisations have begun to unite and become stronger than ever”, added Apaza.

“There is hope that the social organisations, the middle class, intellectuals and everyone united can guarantee the necessary two-thirds [needed] to approve the many laws we need to pass.”

According to a recent Gallup poll, Morales has 57.7% support among voters. His next closest competitor, millionaire Samuel Doria Media, has 9.7% support, followed by the former prefect for Cochabamba, Manfred Reyes Villa, who was revoked from his post in a recall referendum in 2008, with 8.6%.

Loayza told GLW that the right wing has “no solid candidates <193> they don’t have political arguments.

“But we cannot underestimate them: they have economic powers, logistical powers and, what’s more, they count on the support of US imperialism.”

Private corporations control most of Bolivia’s media. Loayza said that they had used this power to “confuse and misinform the population”.

“The only thing they do is try to create confusion and disinformation. That is also why they appeal to terrorist acts to try to halt this revolutionary process.”

However, Loayza said, “we believe that these deep transformations have to be extended throughout all the Americas. This process, headed by Bolivia, Venezuela and Ecuador, has to radiate throughout all of Latin America and transcend the borders of Latin America.

“We believe it is possible to build a better world and that is what the US empire does not want to understand.”

1 comment:

Unknown said...

Thank you for an excellent article.
What it stated was accurate and informative, insofar as I can determine.
What the article omitted is the prescription that I believe is needed--that the movement not only unite the nations south of the border, they must recognize that before any lasting changes occur, other changes north of the border must take place, too. Otherwise the empire that is the USA will continue to wreak havoc to destroy the governance of any and all nations that attempt any form of nationalism or socialism or any other 'ism' that is contrary to the diktats of capitalism.
That is the key, as far as I can determine.
The problems of South and Central America don't usually originate there--they are usually caused by their rapacious neighbors to the North.
It is the modern-day history of the USA abbreviated and accurately stated, and it started many decades before Arbenz was removed from office by the CIA, and with almost every country effected—some multiple times—it hasn't stopped since. The US is key.
The only way I can see such change possible in the USA, is if ordinary citizens were finally able to see that despite their 'gringo-ness' they were the US equivalents of the indigenous/poor of Bolivia, and therefore Evo’s tactics might/should work in the USA, too.
In the same manner that Evo Morales is uniting Bolivians of differing tribal and social ethnicities, some honest, courageous, intelligent, internet-savvy, US-born charismatic speaker must unite the disparate/divided US groups now allowing if not accommodating their own demise. And then the people must elect that person as US president.
Only then will those south of the border be safe and their people—not multi-national corporations—be allowed to prosper.
At least that is how I see it. Others?

Imperialism Is the Arsonist: Marxism’s Contribution to Ecological Literatures and Struggles

Derek Wall ’s article entitled  Imperialism Is the Arsonist: Marxism’s Contribution to Ecological Literatures and Struggles , argues that Ma...