27 Oct 2008

Ken Livingstone launches eight point policy to help London meet the recession

Ken Livingstone launches eight point policy to help London meet the recession

Ken Livingstone today launched eight key policy points to help London meet the effects of the recession. The full text of Ken Livingstone’s statement is as follows.

Eight point policy to help London meet the recession

By Ken Livingstone

27 October 2008

London has entered its first recession for fifteen years. Londoners know the value of their house is falling, their spending is squeezed, and an increasing number are worried about their job security. In this situation the Mayor of London should put forward clear policies which, in areas where he has power, can best help London meet the effects of this recession. I have set out here eight key measures that should be immediately introduced by a Mayor of London. All flow from a clear choice of priorities – that the Mayor must protect the economic development of London, promote social justice and therefore help those who are being most hit by this crisis, and protect the environment.

1. January's above-inflation fares increase can and should be scrapped by returning to taxing polluters

Fares policy on the buses and underground has to be re-prioritised to help ordinary Londoners, instead of the Mayor’s policy of protecting drivers of gas guzzlers. The cancellation of the £25-a-day CO2 congestion charge on the most gas guzzling cars should be reversed – raising up to £50 million a year.

The 'oil for expertise' deal with Venezuela must be reintroduced – gaining London over £20 million a year at current exchange rates.

These measures together will raise over £60 million a year and allow the proposed above inflation fare increase in January to be scrapped and single bus fares kept down to 90p instead of being raised to £1.

The further new wasteful transport proposals should similarly be abandoned. The plan to squander £13 million a year by replacing bendy buses on routes 38, 507 and 521 with ordinary single and double-deckers should be stopped. The costings for these routes show that the pledge to replace all four hundred bendy buses in London would cost Londoners £60 million a year even with existing types of buses, and this should be abandoned. Even worse, the proposal to introduce a 'new Routemaster', with open platforms and conductors has been shown by independent transport consultants to cost over £100 million a year and should be scrapped.

Further financial costs will be imposed on ordinary fare-paying Londoners if the Western Extension of the congestion charging zone is abolished. TfL have stated that abolition would lose London's transport system around £70 million a year. Even the Evening Standard, which calls for the abolition of the Western Extension, and underestimates the losses from abolition, admits it will lose £14 million a year. The Western Extension of the congestion charging zone must stay not only to reduce congestion but to raise revenue to keep fares down.

These measures will save Londoners over £60 million a year in the short term and will eventually save Londoners them around £200 million a year compared to implementation of Boris Johnson's transport plans. This will permit not only the abandonment of January's above-inflation fare increase but allow fares to be held down by the maximum amount in the coming years.

2. Reverse the cuts in Visit London's budget and allocate a £5 million a year boost in the next two years to promote London's visitor economy

In a recession London's £15 billion a year visitor and tourism economy is going to be hit. But the decline in the pound's exchange rate means that it is going to be more possible to attract tourists to London - boosting restaurants, theatres and many other London visitor attractions. Experience shows the effectiveness of tourism-marketing campaigns.

Exactly the wrong course is now being taken through severely cutting the budget of Visit London, London's tourism agency and other budgets for the promotion of London.

The cuts already made must be reversed and for the next two years, the likely length of the recession, a temporary extra grant of £5 million a year should be given to Visit London for marketing the city. This will help aid London's hard pressed visitor economy and pay for itself many times over.

3. Abandon the damaging new restrictive planning regime in London

It is going to be difficult to keep up investment in London during the recession. Yet it is vital that as much private sector construction as possible goes ahead. The new restrictive planning regime emerging from City Hall, based on the model favoured by Westminster City Council under Sir Simon Milton, should be reversed. West End retailers and responsible developers should be told they will get strong support for new development. A planning regime must be introduced in the West End and along the route of Crossrail to ensure that London gets the most from the economic opportunities it offers.

4. Speed up the house building programme and support the call for nationalisation of the necessary parts of the construction industry to carry out a large scale government house building programme

The number of new homes being built – including affordable homes – has very steeply and rapidly declined. In such circumstances the public sector must take a more active role. The Mayor should use all the new powers acquired for housing construction and join the call of Jon Cruddas and other MPs that, if necessary, parts of the construction industry should be nationalised to allow a large scale programme of affordable homes to be undertaken. The policy that 50 per cent of new housing should be affordable housing should be reintroduced - in a recession it will be housing for those on ordinary incomes and the low paid that will be scrapped by developers. The abandonment of the 50 per cent affordable housing policy will therefore be deeply damaging to Londoners. Policies to ensure a strong supply of rented affordable accommodation must be retained.

5. Press on with the big infrastructure projects and reorganize City Hall’s business and transport functions

Any opportunity for London to come through this economic crisis in the best shape possible is in significant part due to the big spending on infrastructure projects that were won during the last two Mayoral terms, such as the Olympics, Crossrail and the Mayor's new housing powers. These investment programmes act counter-cyclically to maintain economic activity and generate tens of thousands of jobs. This contrasts with the Tories’ “small government” approach would never have secured Crossrail. The attempt by discredited monetarists to advise the government against this approach should be roundly rejected by the Mayor and the major investment projects should be defended.

Chaos in the new administration is getting in the way of those who can actually run things in London. The professionalism of many managers in London government, whose skills are vital in a downturn, does not allow them to speak out publicly but the chaos that reigns in the Mayoralty is well-known to close observers of City Hall. It is of particular concern that in two key areas during a recsession – transport and business – the mayor’s office has put forward no proposals for how to deal with the economic situation. This is bad for London. The mayor needs to reorganise how his office is dealing with transport and business as a matter of urgency.

6. Put the focus of the Olympics back on economic development

The most important reason for seeking to win the Olympic Games was to carry out large scale economic development in east London. This perspective has been eroded by the new administration whose actions have effectively counterposed this objective to a pure emphasis on sport. Even more so in a recession the focus in the Olympics must be put back onto large scale economic regeneration and marketing London internationally - and London government must conduct itself accordingly.

7. Reverse the cut backs in regeneration spending by the LDA and halt the risk to its government funding

The London Development Agency should not be funneling its funds into projects that are already being financed by the boroughs, allowing them to cut their own spending. This means that economic regeneration funding in London will fall by several hundred million pounds a year – exactly the reverse of what is required in a recession. Furthermore this misuse of government funding by the LDA, not using the money for its intended purposes of expanding regeneration spending, threatens to lead to the LDA's funds being severely reduced by the government in the medium term. This must stop and LDA funds must be used for their proper purpose of expanding economic regeneration in London.

8. Strengthen London's presence in the key new emerging markets

The weight of the rapidly growing emerging market economies, above all India and China, is going to increase sharply in this recession and they will emerge from it fastest. London must strengthen the relations which it has established with these economies and the Mayor's proposal to cut London's presence in them by scaling back London's offices there must be abandoned.

In a recession far more than economic measures are required. Experience shows that there will be a tendency for crime, or the threat of crime, to increase. The threat of racist attacks will increase, as will the danger of domestic violence against women. The planned reductions in real police spending must therefore be stopped and the cuts in the programmes against racism, and against domestic violence and other threats to women, must be reversed. Measures of environmental protection must continue.

But the eight points above are vital to be included in any programme to tackle the effects of the recession in London and they should be implemented at once.


Notes to editors - What Boris Johnson has been doing

* Boris Johnson has failed to lead the city in the biggest economic challenge it has faced for a decade and a half, claiming that the seriousness of the economic situation is exaggerated: 'There is a great deal of alarm and the whole thing is very much gloomier than it need necessarily be.'

* Liberal Democrat London Assembly leader Mike Tuffrey has said: "I've not seen or heard a word from the Mayor as to how London should respond."'

* In his Daily Telegraph column on 23 September the Mayor wrote: 'Every Lefty from Alex Salmond to Gordon Brown [who] is queuing up to kick the "spivs and speculators", who are apparently the authors of ... the destruction of immeasurable wealth across Britain and the world... the Prime Minister thought fit to announce that the "City must clean up its act".’ The Evening Standard reported that the Mayor ‘risked angering thousands of Londoners struggling to cope during the economic crisis by defending wealthy bankers’. http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-mayor/article-23558942-details/Boris:+Stop+neo-socialist+whingeing+about+City+bankers+and+house+prices/article.do

* Boris Johnson has retained as head of his international business advisory council the head of the firm WPP, despite the fact that this company has now left London to go into tax exile. Bob Diamond, who Boris Johnson declared would head his Mayor's Fund, has departed for the US.


Anonymous said...

Why is Ken is acting as if he thinks he's still the mayor?! please move on mate & forget it! Noone wants to hear about your congestion charges or gas guzzlers! as if London's economy all depends on few hundred cars! what a pity...

Anonymous said...

Readers may like to see Ken's slightly fuller explanation of this policy, and his wider analysis of the financial crisis, as well as other left wing comment on the economic situation, at the economic bulletin he publishes. This is at http://socialisteconomicbulletin.blogspot.com/

Socialist Economic Bulletin

When Keir Starmer was a Marxist.

Canvassing in Brighton back in 2017 to support Green Party MP Caroline Lucas’s re-election efforts, I knocked on a door and came acros...